[NUnitAsp-devl] Upcoming NUnitAsp plans
Brought to you by:
jlittle82
From: Jim S. <js...@ti...> - 2005-04-28 19:55:21
|
Hello, all, Version 1.6 of NUnitAsp will be coming out in a few months, and it already has a lot of important new features: * Supports any version of NUnit, and tools like MbUnit, too * Supports multiple forms * Tests can directly manipulate form variables without a tester * Tests can directly submit and post-back forms without a tester NUnitAsp has gotten to be pretty popular--Google reports about 10,000 pages that mention it. The Italian, German, and Japanese pages are cool, but I knew I'd hit the big time when I started seeing pages in Russian mentioning NUnitAsp. SourceForge tells me that the website gets about 23,000 hits a month and that NUnitAsp is downloaded about 1,300 times a month. I think that's pretty fantastic, and it's all thanks to you using it and telling people about it. Thank you! With the 1.6 release, I'd like to ramp NUnitAsp adoption up another notch. NUnitAsp has always been a useful tool for TDD, but I've noticed that people run into problems using it when they treat ASP.NET like ASP, or when they have legacy systems to support. Plus, let's face it, it isn't easy to test a program over HTTP, no matter how well NUnitAsp abstracts things for you. I'm considering three options to help people use NUnitAsp more effectively. I need your help to know which ones to focus on. I'd appreciate your time to look at the options below and let me know what you think. Please send your responses directly to me... there's no need to spam the list. The first 20 people to respond will get a 25% discount on whatever I end up offering. Option 1: NUnitAsp Training. I've teamed up with a superb developer of training courses to co-develop and deliver an NUnitAsp training course. Potential material includes test-driven development of ASP.NET, custom NUnitAsp tester development, using testbeds and mock objects with NUnitAsp, and ASP.NET architecture. If you're interested in this option, let me know: - How many people on your team would attend? - What material would they be interested in? Introduction to ASP.NET and TDD? TDD for experienced ASP.NET programmers? ASP.NET and NUnitAsp architecture? NUnitAsp and legacy code? Writing custom testers for your custom controls? Something else entirely (tell me what)? - Would you rather come to a public course or have us deliver the course privately at your company? Option 2: Drink from the firehose. Hate training or need specific assistance with advance topics? Get unlimited access, directly to me, to answer any questions about NUnitAsp, test-driven development, and related subjects. I'm notoriously lax about enforcing limits on subject matter. Call any time (while I'm awake!) and I'll respond within 90 minutes, all for a flat monthly fee. I'll respond to email the same day, too. This is especially useful as a roadblock destruction service: when you face a roadblock, call me and I'll get you past it. Senior developers benefit even more: we can talk about the really good stuff. If you're interested in this option, let me know: - How much time did you spend on roadblocks last month? How much time do you typically spend on roadblocks each month? How much time do other members of your team typically spend on roadblocks each month? - How many people are on your team? How many would participate? Of those, how many do you talk to every day about what you're working on? Option 3: Tester packages--I'm considering creating special tester packages for non-core components. For example, I could create a tester package for the Infragistics controls. These would seamlessly plug in to NUnitAsp and would be available for online purchase from my website. If you're interested in this option, let me know: - Which controls do you want to test? (Include the product name or website; if the product is particularly large, like Infragistics, let me know which subset of controls you're most interested in.) - What licensing arrangements do you prefer? - How much would your company pay for a full-featured, robust set of testers for those controls? Option 4: Something completely different--you tell me! Thanks for your time! Cheers, Jim NUnitAsp Grand Poo-bah -- James Shore - Titanium I.T. LLC - Successful Software See my new website and blog: http://www.jamesshore.com phone: 503-267-5490 email: js...@ti... |