Menu
▾
▴
numpy-discussion
|
From: Eric E. <ems...@ob...> - 2006-10-09 08:12:12
|
Hi, thanks for the pointer to pida. I installed it successfully but I didn't manage to make it really work, meaning having my python file opened with gvim and include some debugger (I guess either the installation is not complete or there is something I don't understand when opening a new python file). And the docs is really scarce at the moment so it is quite difficult to pursue along that line. Indeed keeping gvim may be too tight a constraint here. Someone else suggested spe (http://stani.be/python/spe/blog/), but there I have problems getting binaries for wxPython (Suse10.1) and I don't want to attempt a full compilation of that package... (I installed Suse10.1 from the downloadable version and many many packages are missing there - the commercial DVD being double layer... and it seems that only half of it is available on the web). I tried to install eric3, and after checking QScintilla, python-qt, etc, I launch the installation of eric3 with python install.py and I get a seg fault.. frustrating. Eric On 10/6/06, Robert Kern <rob...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Eric Emsellem wrote: > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I am looking for an IDE to develop python programs and I am not sure >> > > what to take. >> > > The two critical items for me are 1/ a good debugger (simple and >> > > efficient) 2/ something simple to manage the files. >> > > >> > > I would also very much like to keep some basic things such as (if >> > > possible): > >> > > - editing with gvim >> > > > > This probably is the most limiting factor. I use pida because it embeds > > gvim > > into a PyGTK frame with all of the IDE goodies around it. > > > > http://pida.berlios.de/ > > > > I believe it can use one of the PyGTK debugger GUIs, but I've never used > > it. > |
|
From: Bill B. <wb...@gm...> - 2006-10-09 08:20:26
|
If you don't mind going commercial, then the WingIDE has been working very well for me. And it apparently has a VIM mode (and emacs). I'm an emacs guy, though, so I haven't tried out the VIM support. Wing is based on GTK so the interface on Windows doesn't look so nice, or act so much like a native Windows app (F10 pops up menus -- weird?), but it works well. I tried a bunch of free IDEs first and gave up out of frustration after a while, too. Wing just worked for me and worked quite well. Documentation is pretty good too. www.wingware.com. Free trial so you can see if you like it first. --bb On 10/9/06, Eric Emsellem <ems...@ob...> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the pointer to pida. I installed it successfully but I didn't manage to make it really work, meaning having my python file opened with gvim and include some debugger (I guess either the installation is not complete or there is something I don't understand when opening a new python file). And the docs is really scarce at the moment so it is quite difficult to pursue along that line. > > Indeed keeping gvim may be too tight a constraint here. > > Someone else suggested spe (http://stani.be/python/spe/blog/), but there I have problems getting binaries for wxPython (Suse10.1) and I don't want to attempt a full compilation of that package... (I installed Suse10.1 from the downloadable version and many many packages are missing there - the commercial DVD being double layer... and it seems that only half of it is available on the web). > > I tried to install eric3, and after checking QScintilla, python-qt, etc, I launch the installation of eric3 with python install.py and I get a seg fault.. > > frustrating. > Eric > > > On 10/6/06, Robert Kern <rob...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > Eric Emsellem wrote: > > > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > I am looking for an IDE to develop python programs and I am not sure > >> > > what to take. > >> > > The two critical items for me are 1/ a good debugger (simple and > >> > > efficient) 2/ something simple to manage the files. > >> > > > >> > > I would also very much like to keep some basic things such as (if > >> > > > possible): > > > >> > > - editing with gvim > >> > > > > > > This probably is the most limiting factor. I use pida because it embeds > > > gvim > > > into a PyGTK frame with all of the IDE goodies around it. > > > > > > http://pida.berlios.de/ > > > > > > I believe it can use one of the PyGTK debugger GUIs, but I've never used > > > it. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Num...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion > |
|
From: Pierre GM <pgm...@ma...> - 2006-10-09 15:12:14
|
On Monday 09 October 2006 04:20, Bill Baxter wrote: > If you don't mind going commercial, then the WingIDE has been working > very well for me. Did anybody mention Eclipse+pydev ? I've been a regular user for the last few months, and I'm quite happy about it. True, Eclipse can be a bit overkill, but it's quite performant. Actually, I use pydev for the development and an interactive shell like ipython for testing/playing around... |
|
From: Charles R H. <cha...@gm...> - 2006-10-09 16:04:32
|
On 10/9/06, Pierre GM <pgm...@ma...> wrote: > > On Monday 09 October 2006 04:20, Bill Baxter wrote: > > If you don't mind going commercial, then the WingIDE has been working > > very well for me. > > Did anybody mention Eclipse+pydev ? I've been a regular user for the last > few > months, and I'm quite happy about it. True, Eclipse can be a bit overkill, > but it's quite performant. Actually, I use pydev for the development and > an > interactive shell like ipython for testing/playing around... There is also a vim emulator plugin for eclipse that costs 15 euro. Here: http://www.satokar.com/viplugin/ Chuck ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Num...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion > |
|
From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2006-10-09 16:48:04
|
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Pierre GM apparently wrote: > Did anybody mention Eclipse+pydev? It used to be a problem to get Eclipse to talk to gvim on Windows (via OLE). Has that changed? Cheers, Alan Isaac |
|
From: Karol L. <kar...@kn...> - 2006-10-09 17:03:30
|
On Monday 09 of October 2006 10:20, Bill Baxter wrote: > If you don't mind going commercial, then the WingIDE has been working > very well for me. > And it apparently has a VIM mode (and emacs). I'm an emacs guy, > though, so I haven't tried out the VIM support. I also have WingIDE installed and like it alot! I don't actually use it as = my=20 main ide, but might in the future. Currently I use Kile (the LaTeX front-en= d=20 from KDE), but it doesn't have any python-specific features. Karol =2D-=20 written by Karol Langner pon pa=BC 9 19:00:27 CEST 2006 |
|
From: Keith G. <kwg...@gm...> - 2006-10-09 17:04:43
|
On 10/9/06, Eric Emsellem <ems...@ob...> wrote: > thanks for the pointer to pida. I installed it successfully but I didn't manage to > makeit really work [snip] I was excited to see that pida can use meld. But when I try to do a diff, pida complains that it cannot find meldembed.py. Has anyone else run into that? I installed pida from binary on debian etch. And meld is installed and working. Hey, wait a minute, isn't this a numpy list? |
|
From: Christopher B. <Chr...@no...> - 2006-10-10 16:47:23
|
Eric Emsellem wrote:
> I have problems getting binaries for wxPython (Suse10.1) and I
> don't want to attempt a full compilation of that package...
Di you try the rpms at sourceforge? one of them may well be compatible.
If not, I've had good luck with building the source rpms:
rpmbuild --rebuild NameOfRPM.srpm
> installed Suse10.1 from the downloadable version and many many
> packages are missing there -
That would be a trick -- you'll need relevant the dev packages. But that
sounds like an issue you'll be coming up against over and over again anyway.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chr...@no...
|
|
From: <hu...@ya...> - 2006-10-10 19:41:47
|
I asked if that will be possible to use ipython instead of the python conso= le=20 in eric4 (I know that it's not possible with eric3) but it's seems that eri= c4=20 does have it's own console. So, at least for me, it's not anymore an option. N. Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 12:47, Christopher Barker a =E9crit=A0: > Eric Emsellem wrote: > > I have problems getting binaries for wxPython (Suse10.1) and I > > don't want to attempt a full compilation of that package... > > Di you try the rpms at sourceforge? one of them may well be compatible. > > If not, I've had good luck with building the source rpms: > > rpmbuild --rebuild NameOfRPM.srpm > > > installed Suse10.1 from the downloadable version and many many > > packages are missing there - > > That would be a trick -- you'll need relevant the dev packages. But that > sounds like an issue you'll be coming up against over and over again > anyway. > > -Chris |
|
From: Darren D. <dd...@co...> - 2006-10-10 20:30:20
|
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 15:41, hu...@ya... wrote: > I asked if that will be possible to use ipython instead of the python > console in eric4 (I know that it's not possible with eric3) but it's seems > that eric4 does have it's own console. So, at least for me, it's not > anymore an option. Why do you say that? I just installed the latest development snapshots, and Eric4 does have its own console. I haven't been able to set ipython as the custom interpretter, but I will ask the developer about it. Darren |
|
From: <hu...@ya...> - 2006-10-11 13:49:13
|
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 16:30, Darren Dale a =E9crit=A0: > On Tuesday 10 October 2006 15:41, hu...@ya... wrote: > > I asked if that will be possible to use ipython instead of the python > > console in eric4 (I know that it's not possible with eric3) but it's > > seems that eric4 does have it's own console. So, at least for me, it's > > not anymore an option. > > Why do you say that? I just installed the latest development snapshots, a= nd > Eric4 does have its own console. I haven't been able to set ipython as the > custom interpretter, but I will ask the developer about it. > > Darren I asked on the mail list and this is the answer from the developer: On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:33, hu...@ya... wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if that will be possible to use ipython with eric4 > instead of the normal python console? > > Thanks, > > N. > _______________________________________________ No. Eric uses it's own console, which talks to a remote Python (or Ruby)=20 interpreter via a network socket. Regards, Detlev =2D-=20 Detlev Offenbach de...@di... |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X