Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bug in fft module?

[Nadav H. <na...@vi...>]

Returning zero length array with the appropriate type code seems to be 
fine (and consistent).

   Nadav.

Todd Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 10:18, Nadav Horesh wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From:	Todd Miller [mailto:jm...@st...]
>>Sent:	Mon 02-Feb-04 15:53
>>To:	Nadav Horesh
>>Cc:	numpy-discussion
>>Subject:	Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bug in fft module?
>>On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 05:49, Nadav Horesh wrote:
>>
>>>In numarray 0.8.1 running, fft (inverse_fft, real_fft etc.) on an empty 
>>>array results in a segmentation fault.
>>>
>>>System: Python 2.3.3 compiled with gcc 3.3.2, on RH9.
>>
>>Hi Nadav,
>>
>>What do you mean by "empty", zero length?
>>
>>==> YES: Something like: fft(array([]))
> 
> 
> Looks like a bug in the fft wrapper code to me.  
> 
> I can either make it a no-op or make it raise an exception.  I'm leaning
> towards the former... do you care which?
> 
> Todd
> 
> 
>>Todd
>>
>>
>>>   Nadav.
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
>>>Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
>>>See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
>>>http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Numpy-discussion mailing list
>>>Num...@li...
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
>>-- 
>>Todd Miller 			
>>Space Telescope Science Institute
>>3700 San Martin Drive
>>Baltimore MD, 21030
>>(410) 338 - 4576
>>
>>
>>
>>