From: David M. C. <co...@ph...> - 2004-01-20 23:04:11
|
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 17:54, Ray Schumacher wrote: > With a cross-over at ~2000 elements, can we safely say that working with > video, FITS cubes or other similar imagery would be fastest with numarray > for summing or dividing 2D arrays? (~920K elements) My benchmark was for 1-D arrays, but checking 2-D shows the crossover is in the same region. I'd say for these types of applications you really want to use numarray. -- |>|\/|< /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ |David M. Cooke http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/ |co...@ph... |