From: Sebastian H. <ha...@ms...> - 2003-12-08 22:27:46
|
I just realized that import numarray as na and from numarray import numeric as na actually just differ in the definition of zeros() (and 3 other calls) Hopefully I was the only one who missed this difference. I thought that since numarray 0.5 everything was now in sub-packages and the second way of doing the import was now the suggested one ... Now I think otherwise and it makes all sense again. Regards, Sebastian Haase > On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 19:44, Sebastian Haase wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm just trying to debug some PyOpenGl stuff . It seems that this is only > > available with Numeric (no numarray !?) > > > > Drawing a 60000 vertex array takes 6 sec ( should be much less than 0.5 sec > > !! ) > > I found this is because all my other code is using numarray and it is this > > conversion that takes so long. > > Switching to Numeric (and back to numarray) got this error message: > > [[[ Num is here numarray !! ]] > > self.m_histPlotArray = Num.zeros((n,2), typecode=Num.Float32) > > TypeError: zeros() got an unexpected keyword argument 'typecode' > > numarray is still weak in a few places for keyword names. Try 'type' > instead. > > Todd > > > > I thought numarray suppossed to be backwards compatible ... so I just > > report this as a bug. > > > > Regards, > > Sebastian > > |