From: Todd M. <jm...@st...> - 2003-09-03 12:43:36
|
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:20, Fernando Perez wrote: > Todd Miller wrote: > > > I thought about this a lot yesterday and today talked it over with > > Perry. There are several ways to fix the problem with mean() and > > sum(), and I'm hoping that you and the rest of the community will help > > sort them out. > > [snip] > > Just a thought: why not make the upcasting an optional parameter? > <snip> That sounds like a great idea. Simple, but doesn't throw out all storage control. > in most cases where you encapsulate low level details in > a high level abstraction, there end up being situations where the details poke > through the abstraction and cause you grief. Thanks for these kind words. -- Todd Miller <jm...@st...> |