Re: [Numpy-discussion] Question about numarray Bool type

[Todd M. <jm...@st...>]

On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 12:16, Francesc Alted wrote:
> Mensaje citado por: Peter Verveer <ve...@em...>:
> > > >That would be somewhat
> > > >simpler if Bool is always garantueed to be either a unsigned or a
> > signed
> > > > char type.
> > >
> > > I think perhaps we should just re-define Bool as signed char.  Any
> > other
> > > opinions?
> > 
> > That would solve the problem.
> 
> I'm in the same position than Peter. I would definitively prefer a standard C 
> type for booleans.
> 
> Francesc Alted
> 

I re-defined Bool as signed char in CVS.   Without any real expertise in
Boolology <ahem>,  I am unqualified to comment further.  Let me know if
you would like something different.

Todd

> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
> www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Num...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
-- 
Todd Miller 			jm...@st...
STSCI / ESS / SSB