Re: [Numpy-discussion] Question about numarray Bool type

[Francesc A. <fa...@op...>]

Mensaje citado por: Peter Verveer <ve...@em...>:
> > >That would be somewhat
> > >simpler if Bool is always garantueed to be either a unsigned or a
> signed
> > > char type.
> >
> > I think perhaps we should just re-define Bool as signed char.  Any
> other
> > opinions?
> 
> That would solve the problem.

I'm in the same position than Peter. I would definitively prefer a standard C 
type for booleans.

Francesc Alted