From: Tim C. <tc...@op...> - 2003-02-08 00:24:40
|
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 10:57, Joachim Saul wrote: > * Tim Churches [2003-02-08 00:07]: > > However, I agree 100% about the potential for leveraging Pyrex in > > Numarray. Not just in Numarray, but around it, too. The Numarray team > > should open serious talks with Greg Ewing about Numarray-enabling Pyrex. > > What is it that needs to be "enabled"? Pyrex handles Numeric (see > Pyrex FAQ), why should it not handle Numarray? AFAIK Pyrex > contains no code to specifically support Numeric, and it should > therefore be straightforward to use it with Numarray as well. Hmmm, maybe re-implementing MA in Pyrex is possible right now. Double hmmm.... Tim C |