From: Todd M. <jm...@st...> - 2003-02-04 12:04:55
|
Francesc Alted wrote: >Hi, > >It seems that recarray doesn't support more than 1-D numarray arrays as >fields. Is that a fundamental limitation? > I don't think it is fundamental, merely a question of what is needed and works easily. I see two problems with multi-d numarray fields, both solvable: 1. Multidimensional numarrays must be described in the recarray spec. 2. Either numarray or recarray must be able to handle a (slightly) more complicated case of recomputing array strides from shape and (bytestride,record-length). I didn't design or implement recarray so there may be other problems as well. >If not, do you plan to support >arbitrary dimensions in the future?. > I don't think it's a priority now. What do you need them for? > >Thanks, > > > Regards, Todd |