Re: [Numpy-discussion] complex diagonal matrix

[Konrad H. <hi...@cn...>]

ba...@ph... writes:

> I just wondered if there is a "nicer" way of generating
> a complex diagonal matrix than
>   a)
>      v=arange(10,typecode=Complex)
>      mat=diag(v)
>   b)
>      v=arange(10)
>      mat=diag(v)+0j
> 
> Namely, wouldn't something like
>   v=arange(10)
>   mat=diag(v,typecode=Complex)
> be nicer?

Why would that be nicer?

Personally, I prefer to have explicit typecodes limited to a very
small number of array generators, and have all other functions apply
the standard type-preservation rules.

Konrad.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen                            | E-Mail: hi...@cn...
Centre de Biophysique Moleculaire (CNRS) | Tel.: +33-2.38.25.56.24
Rue Charles Sadron                       | Fax:  +33-2.38.63.15.17
45071 Orleans Cedex 2                    | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/
France                                   | Nederlands/Francais
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------