From: Magnus L. H. <ma...@he...> - 2002-12-15 22:02:47
|
Todd Miller <jm...@st...>: > [snip] > What I'm saying is that in the future it will work correctly. :) OK :) > Most likely as you suggest, but I haven't really looked at the code, > just the rather sickening results. Well, what I was asking about was really what you meant by "correct". My interpretation of "correct" here was that only tuples and slices would be allowed as indexes. BTW: I found something else that I think is rather odd: >>> x = [0, 0, 0] >>> y = [1, 1, 1] >>> p = 1 >>> x[p:], y[p:] = y[p:], x[p:] >>> x, y ([0, 1, 1], [1, 0, 0]) >>> x = array([0, 0, 0]) >>> y = array([1, 1, 1]) >>> x[p:], y[p:] = y[p:], x[p:] >>> x, y (array([0, 1, 1]), array([1, 1, 1])) This seems like a bug to me. The assignment ought to swap the tails of the sequences, as is the case with lists, but with numeric arrays, some weird form of overwriting occurs. I guess this may be an optimization (i.e. to avoid making copies), but it is rather confusing. What do you think? > Todd -- Magnus Lie Hetland Practical Python The Anygui Project http://hetland.org http://ppython.com http://anygui.org |