Re: [Numpy-discussion] (a and b) != (b and a) ?

[Chris B. <Chr...@no...>]

Reggie Dugard wrote:
> This is not, in fact, a bug although I've fallen prey to the same
> mistake myself.  I'm assuming what you really wanted was to use
> logical_and:

> So the "and" is just returning its second argument, since both arguments
> are considered "True" (containing at least 1 "True" element).

I imagine there is a compelling reason that "and" and "or" have not been
overridden like the comparison operators, but it sure would be nice!

-Chris




-- 
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
                                    		
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT         (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chr...@no...