From: Scott R. <ra...@ph...> - 2002-06-11 18:53:50
|
On June 11, 2002 02:43 pm, Perry Greenfield wrote: > Yet on the other hand, it is undeniably convenient to use > repr (by typing a variable) for small arrays interactively > rather than using a print statement. This leads to 3 possible > proposals for handling repr: > > 1) Do what is done now, always print a string that when > eval'ed will recreate the array. > > 2) Only give summary information for the array regardless of > its size. > > 3) Print the array if it has fewer than THRESHOLD number of > elements, otherwise print a summary. THRESHOLD may be adjusted > by the user. > > The last appears to be the most utilitarian to us, yet > 'impure' somehow. Certainly there are may objects for which I vote for number 3, and have no hang-ups about any real or perceived "impurity". This is an issue that I deal with daily. Scott -- Scott M. Ransom Address: McGill Univ. Physics Dept. Phone: (514) 398-6492 3600 University St., Rm 338 email: ra...@ph... Montreal, QC Canada H3A 2T8 GPG Fingerprint: 06A9 9553 78BE 16DB 407B FFCA 9BFA B6FF FFD3 2989 |