Re: [Numpy-discussion] Right behavior

[<jo...@oh...>]

The first numbers in each of your three runs are 7.98493051529 ,
7.98525762558 and 7.98623776436.
They look like different numbers to me.=20

First, thanks for your answer Time.=20
I do agree, they are different.  But I wouldn't call it random.  I =
didn't expect
that the small difference in the initial seed would affect the first =
number with so little.
Usually the seed numbers I have experienced other places have much more
dramatic effect on the numbers,  if you see what I mean...

If you want the difference
between initial values to be greater, you need to make the=20
difference in your seeds greater. For example, if I run your code now, I
get 8.29225027561, 8.29484963417 and 8.29744851589, but setting the seed
to (1,2) gives an initial value of 5.69397783279. Remember, these are
only pseudorandom numbers.=20

Yes, they are pseudorandom and that is OK.  What I just want is some =
more
initial difference between the runs without setting the seed number =
manually.
But know I know this is not a flaw in the RNG, but "its the way it is =
supposed to be"

Thanks

--
Johan Fredrik Ohman