From: Pearu P. <pe...@ce...> - 2002-03-18 20:32:09
|
<blink>Off topic warning</blink> On 18 Mar 2002, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > I see the main difference in distribution philosophy. NumPy is an > add-on package to Python, which is in turn used by other add-on > packages in a modular way. SciPy is rather a monolithic > super-distribution for scientific users. > > Personally I strongly favour the modular package approach, and in fact > I haven't installed SciPy on my system for that reason, although I > would be interested in some of its components. Me too. In what I have contributed to SciPy, I have tried to follow this modularity approach. Modularity is also important property from the development point of view: it minimizes possible interference with other unreleated modules and their bugs. What I am trying to say here is that SciPy can (and should?, +1 from me) provide its components separately, though, currently only few of its components seem to be available in that way without some changes. Pearu |