From: Konrad H. <hi...@cn...> - 2002-01-04 10:31:53
|
Joe Harrington <jh...@oo...> writes: > The latest Numeric release on the web site is 20.3. The latest with > an RPM is 20.1, and that RPM has a problem: it creates a directory in > the system root directory. Paul D. says he will implement a solution > but doesn't have the experience with RPMs (or the time) to find the > problem quickly. I haven't dealt with building Python packages or If someone can give a precise description of the problem, I'll look at it, I think I have done enough RPMs to find my way... The RPMs generated by Distutils are often good enough, but sometimes need some manual cleanup. > distutils (is distutils a separate thing or part of Python?) at all. It is a part of Python since Python 1.6. > installation manager. We need these (very) early adopters, so I think > that having a current Numeric RPM for i386 Linux (and the equivalent I agree in principle, but providing Linux binary RPMs is becoming more and more messy: it depends on the Python version and on the distribution, sometimes even the distribution version number. That's a lot of RPMs. Source RPMs are easier, with some care they should work everywhere, but installation requires a compiler plus some of the "-devel" packages that not everyone has. > Also, it would be more consistent with the RPM naming scheme to call > the RPM "python-Numeric" (or "python-numeric", or even "numpy") rather > than just "Numeric". If that's hard or philosophically undesirable, Agreed. Konrad. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Konrad Hinsen | E-Mail: hi...@cn... Centre de Biophysique Moleculaire (CNRS) | Tel.: +33-2.38.25.56.24 Rue Charles Sadron | Fax: +33-2.38.63.15.17 45071 Orleans Cedex 2 | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/ France | Nederlands/Francais ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |