RE: [Numpy-discussion] Re: Numeric.transpose (incorrect documentation)

[Paul F. D. <pa...@pf...>]

I will try to put a note in the transpose section if there isn't one there
already. As noted, there are numerous reference-instead-of-a-copy returns in
Numeric which reflect the speed rather than safety orientation of the
original designer. Many complaints of this nature are a complaint about that
choice, which made a package that was harder to understand and more
difficult to use safely but which is about as fast as possible. I didn't
like some of these choices but then again I didn't do the work.

-----Original Message-----
From: num...@li...
[mailto:num...@li...]On Behalf Of Tim
Hochberg
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 1:35 PM
To: num...@li...
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Re: Numeric.transpose (incorrect
documentation)



"Curtis Jensen" <cj...@bi...> wrote in message
news:3B6...@bi......
> the documenation for the "transpose" function for the "Numeric" module
> seems to be incoorect, or at least missleading.

The correct place for this is probably the numpy-discussion list, so I'm
cc'ing it there. Perhaps the Paul Dubois will see it and have some ideas for
clearing of the docs.