From: Oliver H. <o.h...@sm...> - 2000-09-12 18:34:58
|
Konrad Hinsen (hi...@cn...) wrote: > I haven't done any comparisons, but I suspect that Numeric.take() is > faster for large arrays. Try this: Yes, indeed. Actually, it is so fast that the first time I rewrote the script last week I was quite convinced it had to be buggy. Thanks again everyone, Oliver -- Oliver Hofmann - University of Cologne - Department of Biochemistry o.h...@sm... - se...@gm... - co...@th... "It's too bad she won't live. But then, who does?" <Gaff, Blade Runner> |