From: Robert K. <rob...@gm...> - 2006-11-09 22:15:32
|
Christopher Barker wrote: > I'm a bit confused, because I thought that when you extracted a scalar > from an array, you got regular python scalar for the datatypes that are > supported. This made it clear that you always get a numpy Scalar, which, > in a few situations, behaves differently than a seemingly equivalent > Python scalar. Part of the point of adding scalar types was to ensure that a[0], for example, always exposes the array interface (.shape, .dtype, etc.) whether a.shape is (10,) or (10, 10). This uniformity aids generic programming. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco |