From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2006-09-22 13:52:32
|
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Bill Baxter apparently wrote: > Ok, here's my best shot at a generalized repmat: Sorry to always repeat this suggestion when it comes to repmat, but I think the whole approach is wrong. A repmat should be a separate object type, which behaves like the described matrix but has only one copy of the repetitive data. Cheers, Alan Isaac |