From: Christopher B. <Chr...@no...> - 2006-09-20 16:57:08
|
Sebastian Haase wrote: > The best I can hope for is a "sound" default for most (practical) cases... > I still think that 80bit vs. 128bit vs 96bit is rather academic for most > people ... most people seem to only use float64 and then there are some > that use float32 (like us) ... I fully agree with Sebastian here. As Travis pointed out, "all we are talking about is the default". The default should follow the principle of least surprise for the less-knowledgeable users. Personally, I try to always use doubles, unless I have a real reason not to. The recent change of default types for zeros et al. will help. clearly, there is a problem to say the default accumulator for *all* types is double, as you wouldn't want to downcast float128s, even if they are obscure. However, is it that hard to say that the default accumulator will have *at least* the precision of double? Robert Kern wrote: > Let me offer a third path: the algorithms used for .mean() and .var() are > substandard. There are much better incremental algorithms that entirely avoid > the need to accumulate such large (and therefore precision-losing) intermediate > values. This, of course, is an even better solution, unless there are substantial performance impacts. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chr...@no... |