From: Bill B. <wb...@gm...> - 2006-09-20 03:26:26
|
On 9/20/06, Charles R Harris <cha...@gm...> wrote: > > I guess I'm not really aware of the float96 type ... > > Is that a "machine type" on any system ? I always thought that -- e.g . > > coming from C -- double is "as good as it gets"... > > Who uses float96 ? I heard somewhere that (some) CPUs use 80bits > > internally when calculating 64bit double-precision... > > > I'm going to side with Travis here. It is only a default and easily > overridden. And yes, there are precisions greater than double. I was using > quad precision back in the eighties on a VAX for some inherently ill > conditioned problems. And on my machine long double is 12 bytes. > And on Intel chips the internal fp precision is 80bits. The D programming language even exposes this 80-bit floating point type to the user. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/type.html http://www.digitalmars.com/d/faq.html#real --bb |