Re: [Numpy-discussion] max argmax combo

[Francesc A. <fa...@ca...>]

A Dimarts 19 Setembre 2006 19:21, Charles R Harris va escriure:
> On 9/19/06, Francesc Altet <fa...@ca...> wrote:
> > A Dimarts 19 Setembre 2006 07:18, Charles R Harris va escriure:
> > > I note that argsort also produces indexes that are hard to use in the
> > > ndim>1 case.
> >
> > Perhaps it is worth to mention here that I've always liked to have a
> > sort()
> > and argsort() functionality merged in one shot function (or method).
> > Having
> > both separated implies two sorts, while if I'd have such a combo
> > available,
> > the resulting operation would take quite less time.
>
> Do you want both the indexes and index sorted array returned, or just sort
> the array using indexes, i.e., something like
>
> a.sort(kind=3D"quicksort", method=3D"indirect")

Uh, I don't understand what do you mean by "sort the array using indexes",=
=20
sorry.

What I'd like is to get the indexes and the sorted array returned. Or, anot=
her=20
option could be getting the sorted indexes returned and a sort of the array=
=20
done in-place (which is surely faster).=20

Regards,

=2D-=20
>0,0<   Francesc Altet =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.carabos.com/
V   V   C=C3=A1rabos Coop. V. =C2=A0=C2=A0Enjoy Data
 "-"