From: Nick F. <nv...@MI...> - 2006-08-26 18:00:41
|
On Aug 26, 2006, at 7:05 AM, Keith Goodman wrote: > On 8/26/06, Bill Baxter <wb...@gm...> wrote: >> On 8/26/06, Travis Oliphant <oli...@ie...> wrote: >> >>> >>> I've come up with adding the functions (not methods at this point) >>> >>> deletefrom >>> insertinto >> >> >> "delete" and "insert" really would be better. The current "insert" >> function seems inaptly named. What it does sounds more like >> "overlay" or >> "set_masked". > > I prefer delete and insert too. I guess it is OK that del and delete > are similar (?) How about "deleted" and "inserted" to parallel "sorted"? "delete" and "insert" sound very imperative and side-effects-ish. Nick |