From: Charles R H. <cha...@gm...> - 2006-08-26 16:30:01
|
Hi, On 8/26/06, Keith Goodman <kwg...@gm...> wrote: > > On 8/26/06, Bill Baxter <wb...@gm...> wrote: > > On 8/26/06, Travis Oliphant <oli...@ie...> wrote: > > > > > > > > I've come up with adding the functions (not methods at this point) > > > > > > deletefrom > > > insertinto > > > > > > "delete" and "insert" really would be better. The current "insert" > > function seems inaptly named. What it does sounds more like "overlay" > or > > "set_masked". > > I prefer delete and insert too. I guess it is OK that del and delete > are similar (?) Me too, although remove could be used instead of delete. Is there a problem besides compatibility with removing or changing the old insert? Chuck |