From: David G. <dav...@gm...> - 2006-08-21 23:26:16
|
On 8/21/06, Robert Kern <rob...@gm...> wrote: > > David Grant wrote: > > I was a bit surprised today to find that numpy.random.rand doesn't > > take in a tuple as input for the dimensions of the desired array. I am > > very used to using a tuple for zeros, ones. Also, wouldn't this mean > > that it would not be possible to add other non-keyword arguments to > > rand later? > > Don't use rand(), then. Use random(). rand()'s sole purpose in life is to > *not* > take a tuple. If you like, you can read the archives on the several (long) > discussions on this and why things are the way they are now. We finally > achieved > something resembling consensus, so please let's not resurrect this > argument. Thanks everyone. My only question now is why there is random_sample and random. My guess is that one is there for compatibility with older releases and so I'm not bothered by it. -- David Grant http://www.davidgrant.ca |