From: Daran L. R. <dr...@uc...> - 2006-08-10 19:33:59
|
Hi Sasha, > Inverting a matrix with masked values does not make much sense. Call > "filled" method with an appropriate fill value before passing the > matrix to "inv". In principle you are right, but even though I use masked arrays in this operation, when the operation itself is done no masked values remain. Thus, my code works very well with the "old" Numeric--and has worked well for some time. That said, I will try your suggestion of doing a "filled" on the matrix before sending it off to the inverse module. Thanks, Daran |