Re: [Numpy-discussion] uniform() regression(?) in svn

[Stefan v. d. W. <st...@su...>]

Hi Darren

On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 02:33:17PM -0400, Darren Dale wrote:
> I dont know if this is related or not, but I just did an update from th=
e trunk=20
> ('1.0b2.dev2918') and discovered the following error:
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> FAIL: Ticket #99
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  =20
> File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/core/tests/test_regressi=
on.py",=20
> line 182, in check_intp
>     self.failUnlessRaises(OverflowError,N.intp,'0xb72a7008',16)
> AssertionError: OverflowError not raised

Are you running on a 64 bit machine?  I'll fix the test (which was
written on a 32 bit machine), but I also noticed some strange
behaviour:

In [11]: N.intp('0xfffffffffffffff',16)
Out[11]: 1152921504606846975

In [12]: N.intp('0xffffffffffffffff',16)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
exceptions.TypeError                                 Traceback (most rece=
nt call last)

/home/stefan/<ipython console>

TypeError: function takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)

Cheers
St=E9fan