From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2006-07-16 15:40:04
|
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, "David M. Cooke" apparently wrote: > 'inverse' is not much longer than 'inv', and is more descriptive But 'inv' is quite universal (can you name a matrix language that uses 'inverse' instead?) and I think unambiguous (what might it be confused with?). Cheers, Alan Isaac |