From: Sven S. <sve...@gm...> - 2006-07-14 08:51:56
|
Curzio Basso schrieb: >> Well try it out and see for yourself ;-) > > good point :-) > >> But for sums it doesn't make a difference, right... Note that it's >> called nan*sum* and not nanwhatever. > > sure, I was still thinking about the first post which was referring to > the average... > > qrz > Right, having to count the Nans then makes the masked-array solution more attractive, that's true. So maybe that's a feature request, complementing the nansum function by a nanaverage? |