From: Pau G. <pau...@gm...> - 2006-07-13 08:37:06
|
On 7/12/06, Victoria G. Laidler <la...@st...> wrote: > Hi, > > Pardon me if I'm reprising an earlier discussion, as I'm new to the list. > > But is there a reason that this obscure syntax > > A[arange(2)[:,newaxis],indexes] > > A[arange(A.shape[0])[:,newaxis],indexes] > > is preferable to the intuitively reasonable thing that the Original > Poster did? > > A[indexes] > i don't think so. The obscure syntax is just a way you can solve the problem with the current state of NumPy. Of course, a more clearer syntax would be better, but for this, something in NumPy should be changed. This other syntax is longer but clearer: ind = indices(A.shape) ind[ax] = A.argsort(axis=ax) A[ind] Which brings me to the question: Would it be reasonable if argsort returned the complete tuple of indices, so that A[A.argsort(ax)] would work ? pau |