Re: [Numpy-discussion] Args for rand and randn: call for a vote

[Christopher B. <Chr...@no...>]

Ed Schofield wrote:
> * Should numpy.rand and numpy.randn accept sequences of dimensions as  
> arguments, like rand((3,3)), as an alternative to rand(3,3)?

+1


+1 for ONLY allowing tuples.

Or just get rid of it.


-Chris


-- 
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
                                     		
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT         (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chr...@no...