Re: [Numpy-discussion] .M .A .T .H attribute result

[Charles R H. <cha...@gm...>]

Hi all,

On 7/8/06, Fernando Perez <fpe...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On 7/7/06, Travis Oliphant <oli...@ee...> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't compile the results, but the discussion on the idea of adding
> > new attributes to the array object led to the following result.
> >
> > Added:  .T attribute to mean self.transpose()
>
> [...]
>
> > .H
> >
> > A few were in favor, but this can now be written .T.conj()  which is not
> > bad so does not get a new attribute.
>
> I didn't have strong feelings one way or another on this, so I didn't
> vote, but at this point I'd like to make a comment before the freeze.
> Given that .T went in, I'd argue that .H should be in as well.
> Basically, I now think these two should have been considered as a
> bundle and not as separate options.


+1. H is just the complex counterpart of T.

Chuck