Re: [Numpy-discussion] Args for rand and randn: call for a vote

[Alan I. <ai...@am...>]

Ed Schofield wrote:
<mailto:da...@te...>
> * Should numpy.rand and numpy.randn accept sequences of dimensions as  
> arguments, like rand((3,3)), as an alternative to rand(3,3)?
>   

For allowing tuples:
+1

For *only* allowing tuples:
+1

Alan Isaac