Re: [Numpy-discussion] Args for rand and randn: call for a vote

[Darren D. <dd...@co...>]

On Saturday 08 July 2006 7:07 am, Ed Schofield wrote:
> * Should numpy.rand and numpy.randn accept sequences of dimensions as
> arguments, like rand((3,3)), as an alternative to rand(3,3)?

+1

-- 
Darren S. Dale, Ph.D.
dd...@co...