Re: [Numpy-discussion] Args for rand and randn: call for a vote

[Sven S. <sve...@gm...>]

Ed Schofield schrieb:

> 
> I'd like to call for a vote on what people would prefer, and then ask  
> Travis to make a final pronouncement before the feature freeze.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> * Should numpy.rand and numpy.randn accept sequences of dimensions as  
> arguments, like rand((3,3)), as an alternative to rand(3,3)?
> 
+1

(Thanks Ed for trying to reach a conclusion on this.)
-sven