From: Sven S. <sve...@gm...> - 2006-07-07 08:40:49
|
Travis Oliphant schrieb: > > 1) .T Have some kind of .T attribute > +0 (the discussion in the .T thread convinced me it's better to keep the matrix playground as a separate subclass, and so it's not important for me what happens with pure arrays) > > 2) .H returns .T.conj() +0 > > > 3) .M returns matrix version of array +1 !! (Either that, or I will soon get on your nerves demanding matrix versions of ones, zeros, rand, eye etc.!) > > > 4) .A returns basearray (useful for sub-classes). +0 ? (Already exists for matrix, doesn't it?) -sven |