Re: [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0

[Tim L. <tim...@gm...>]

On 7/1/06, Eric Jonas <jo...@mi...> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 12:35 -0400, Sasha wrote:
> > > Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems.  We all know
> > > that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest
> > > routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
> >
> > Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy
> > unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%.
>
> Given the coverage is so low, how can people help by contributing unit
> tests? Are there obvious areas with poor coverage? Travis, do you have
> any opinions on this?
>                 ...Eric
>
>

A handy tool for finding these things out is coverage.py. I've found
it quite helpful in checking unittest coverage in the past.

http://www.nedbatchelder.com/code/modules/coverage.html

I don't think I'll have a chance in the immediate future to try it out
with numpy, but if someone does, I'm sure it will give some answers to
your questions Eric.

Cheers,

Tim Leslie

>
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Num...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>