Re: [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0

[Keith G. <kwg...@gm...>]

On 6/30/06, Sasha <nd...@ma...> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Fernando Perez <fpe...@gm...> wrote:
> > ...
> > Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems.  We all know
> > that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest
> > routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
>
> Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy
> unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%.

That's a conundrum. A joke is no longer a joke once you point out, yes
it is a joke.