Re: [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0

[Travis N. V. <tr...@en...>]

Sasha wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Fernando Perez <fpe...@gm...> wrote:
>   
>> ...
>> Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems.  We all know
>> that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest
>> routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
>>     
>
> Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy
> unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%.
>   
Very obviously a joke...uh...with the exception of enthought-written 
scientific code, of course ;-)