Re: [Numpy-discussion] logical_and operator, &&, is missing?

[Alan G I. <ai...@am...>]

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Eric Firing apparently wrote: 
> I suspect that many other people will trip over the lack 
> of && in the same way that I have, and will similarly 
> consider it an irritant that we work around because we 
> have to, not because it is good. 

I agree with this.

In addition, turning to & when && is wanted
will likely cause occasional stumbles over operator 
precedence.  (At least I've been bitten that way.)

But I do not see this changing unless Python grants
the ability to define new operators, in which case
I'm sure the wish lists will come out ...

Cheers,
Alan Isaac