From: Pierre GM <pgm...@ma...> - 2006-06-24 20:12:10
|
Michael, > Is anyone else seeing this? It should be easy to test. If so, I > think it's a bug. Yeah, I see that as well. In MA.power(a,b), a temporary mask is created, True for values a<=0. (check L1577 of the sources, `md = make_mask(umath.less_equal (fa, 0), flag=1)`). The combination of this temp and the initial mask defines the final mask. This condition could probably be relaxed to `md = make_mask(umath.less(fa, 0), flag=1)` That way, the a=0 elements wouldn't be masked, and you'd get the proper result. I haven't really time to double-check/create a patch, tough. Meanwhile, Michael, you could just modify your numpy/core/ma.py accordingly. |