From: Ed S. <sch...@ft...> - 2006-06-22 07:54:35
|
On 22/06/2006, at 12:40 AM, Bill Baxter wrote: > Actually I think using mat() (just an alias for the matrix > constructor) is a bad way to do it. That mat() (and most others on > that page) should probably be replaced with asmatrix() to avoid the > copy. Perhaps the 'mat' function should become an alias for 'asmatrix'. I've thought this for a while. Then code and documentation like this page could remain short and simple without incurring the performance penalty. Go on, shoot me down! :) -- Ed |