From: Alexandre F. <ale...@lo...> - 2006-06-16 12:11:26
|
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:43:42AM +0200, Sven Schreiber wrote: > > Again, there is no defense for abbreviating linear_least_squares > > because it is unlikely to appear in an expression and waste valuable > > horisontal space. =20 >=20 > not true imho; btw, I would suggest "ols" (ordinary least squares), > which is in every textbook. Please, keep the zen of python in mind : Explicit is better than implicit.=20 --=20 Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France) Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/formations D=E9veloppement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services Informatique scientifique: http://www.logilab.fr/science |