From: Sven S. <sve...@gm...> - 2006-06-03 09:53:22
|
Robert Kern schrieb: > > My point is that there is no need to change rand() and randn() to the "new" > interface. The "new" interface is already there: random.random() and > random.standard_normal(). > Ok thanks for the responses and sorry for not searching the archives about this. I tend to share Alan's point of view, but I also understand that it may be too late now to change the way rand is called. -Sven |