From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2006-02-24 14:06:15
|
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Stefan van der Walt apparently wrote: > Below follows the benchmark of seven possible repmat > functions: Probably I a misunderstanding something here. But I thought the idea of repmat was that it used a single copy of the data to represent multiple copies in a matrix, and all these functions seem ultimately to use multiple copies of the data. If that is right, then a repmat should be a subclass of matrix. I think ... Cheers, Alan Isaac |