From: Todd M. <jm...@st...> - 2004-06-25 12:48:44
|
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 18:06, Sebastian Haase wrote: > Hi, > please take a look at this: > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) ) > [0 0 0 0 0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , 0) > [0 0 0 0 0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , 1) > [0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , 2) > [0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , 3) > [0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , 4) > [0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , -1) > [0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , -2) > [0 0 0 0 0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , -3) > [0 0] > >>> na.sum( na.zeros((2,6)) , -4) > [0 0] > >>> > > I think here should be a ValueError exception thrown rather than defaulting to > the '-1'-axis. Comments ? This is a bug. Hopefully I'll get it today. > Also this applies to (all?) other functions that have an 'axis' argument. > And further I just found that putting "too many slicings" to an array also > gets silently ignored: > >>> b.shape > (7, 128, 128, 128) > >>> b[2,2,2,2,3] > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<input>", line 1, in ? > IndexError: too many indices. > > BUT: > >>> b[2:3 , 2:3 , 2:3 , 2:3 , 2:3 , 2:3] > [[[[ 0.]]]] > > > I find this very confusing !! Is there any good reason not to have the > "IndexError" exception in all cases ? This is also a bug. Fixed in CVS now. Thanks for the report! Regards, Todd |