From: David M. C. <co...@ph...> - 2004-06-25 05:44:38
|
On June 24, 2004 04:10 pm, Todd Miller wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 15:26, David M. Cooke wrote: > > On June 24, 2004 01:46 pm, Sebastian Haase wrote: > > > In general it must be OK to compare anything with None, right ? > > > (BTW, I get the same error with == and !=) > > > > No! Not in general! > > Well, this is a good point. I think the current numerical behavior was > a hack I stuck in for people who might not be aware of "is". It's > looking like a mistake now. I've fixed up all uses of == None and != None in my copy of the numarray CVS, but the anonymous CVS on SourceForge is timing out :-(, so I haven't made a patch yet. Basically, I ran 'grep -R "[!=]= *None" *' to find all uses of == and != None, and replaced them with is/is not None. That would remove possible bugs. -- |>|\/|< /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ |David M. Cooke http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/ |co...@ph... |