From: Todd M. <jm...@st...> - 2004-06-24 15:33:54
|
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 10:30, Rick White wrote: > On 24 Jun 2004, Todd Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 06:14, Curzio Basso wrote: > > > > > I noticed that when multiplying two matrices of type Float32, the result > > > is Float64: > > > > I modified dot() and innerproduct() this morning to return Float32 and > > Complex32 for like inputs. > > I wonder whether it would be worth providing an option to accumulate > the sums using Float64 and to convert to Float32 before storing them in > an array. I suspect that one reason this returned Float64 is that it > is very easy to run into precision/roundoff problems in > single-precision matrix multiplies. You could avoid that by using > doubles for the sum while still returning the result as a single. > Rick OK. I implemented intermediate sums using Float64 and Complex64 but single precision inputs will still result in single precision outputs. Todd |